Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs RMFAX
FFFMX vs RMFAX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs RMFAX
FFFMX vs RMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX (117B) and RMFAX (117B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FFFMX pays higher dividends than RMFAX: FFFMX (1.70) vs RMFAX (0.79). FFFMX was incepted earlier than RMFAX: FFFMX (6 years) vs RMFAX (24 years). RMFAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). FFFMX (30.00) and RMFAX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFFMX (250) and RMFAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.53 vs. RMFAX (9.32). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. RMFAX (34.55).
| FFFMX | RMFAX | FFFMX / RMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.36 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.36 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.469 | 5.965 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 117B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 0.79 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.53 | 9.32 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.97 | 30.67 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.95 | 34.55 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WAAEX | 36.89 | -0.18 | -0.49% |
| Wasatch Small Cap Growth Investor | |||
| LGCCX | 21.07 | -0.15 | -0.71% |
| Lord Abbett Global Equity C | |||
| JAMRX | 94.99 | -1.11 | -1.16% |
| Janus Henderson Research T | |||
| DPRRX | 14.71 | -0.18 | -1.21% |
| Nomura Global Listed Real Assets R | |||
| DLCFX | 17.15 | -0.22 | -1.27% |
| Destinations Large Cap Equity I | |||