Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs WHGLX
FFFMX vs WHGLX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs WHGLX
FFFMX vs WHGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFMX vs. WHGLX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFMX is a Hold and WHGLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. WHGLX (77.2M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than WHGLX: FFFMX (1.66) vs WHGLX (1.02). FFFMX was incepted earlier than WHGLX: FFFMX (6 years) vs WHGLX (20 years). WHGLX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). WHGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGLX: FFFMX (250) vs WHGLX (100000). FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. WHGLX (-6.74). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.70 vs. WHGLX (-6.56).
| FFFMX | WHGLX | FFFMX / WHGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.63 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.71 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.030 | 11.699 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 77.2M | 152,850% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.02 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | -6.74 | -122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.37 | 6.25 | 630% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.70 | -6.56 | -590% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement