Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs WHGLX
FFFMX vs WHGLX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs WHGLX
FFFMX vs WHGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. WHGLX (73.8M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than WHGLX: FFFMX (1.70) vs WHGLX (1.05). FFFMX was incepted earlier than WHGLX: FFFMX (6 years) vs WHGLX (20 years). WHGLX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). WHGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGLX: FFFMX (250) vs WHGLX (100000). FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. WHGLX (-8.85). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.95 vs. WHGLX (-10.42).
| FFFMX | WHGLX | FFFMX / WHGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.63 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.71 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.238 | 4.868 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 73.8M | 158,537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.05 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.00 | -8.85 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.05 | 1.65 | 2,244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.95 | -10.42 | -374% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement