Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs WHGQX
FFFMX vs WHGQX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs WHGQX
FFFMX vs WHGQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. WHGQX (74.5M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than WHGQX: FFFMX (1.70) vs WHGQX (1.12). FFFMX was incepted earlier than WHGQX: FFFMX (6 years) vs WHGQX (4 years). WHGQX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). WHGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGQX: FFFMX (250) vs WHGQX (1000000). FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.99 vs. WHGQX (-7.17).
| FFFMX | WHGQX | FFFMX / WHGQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.55 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.63 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.825 | 5.837 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 74.5M | 157,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.12 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.99 | -7.17 | -153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.62 | 2.65 | 1,420% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.88 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement