Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs WHGQX
FFFMX vs WHGQX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs WHGQX
FFFMX vs WHGQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. WHGQX (76.2M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than WHGQX: FFFMX (1.68) vs WHGQX (1.12). FFFMX was incepted earlier than WHGQX: FFFMX (6 years) vs WHGQX (4 years). WHGQX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). WHGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGQX: FFFMX (250) vs WHGQX (1000000). FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. WHGQX (-7.44).
| FFFMX | WHGQX | FFFMX / WHGQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.55 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.63 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.487 | 8.584 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 76.2M | 154,856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.12 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | -7.44 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.38 | 2.23 | 1,678% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.56 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement