Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGAX vs FRNRX
FFGAX vs FRNRX Comparison
Open Charts FFGAX vs FRNRX
FFGAX vs FRNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGAX vs. FRNRX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGAX is a Hold and FRNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGAX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. FRNRX (503M). FFGAX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: FFGAX (2.00) vs FRNRX (1.47). FFGAX was incepted earlier than FRNRX: FFGAX (17 years) vs FRNRX (31 years). FFGAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). FFGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FFGAX (6%) and FRNRX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FFGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRNRX: FFGAX (0) vs FRNRX (1000). FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.57 vs. FFGAX (38.31). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 138.08 vs. FFGAX (97.12).
| FFGAX | FRNRX | FFGAX / FRNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.00 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.01 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.476 | 20.066 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 503M | 262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.47 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.31 | 40.57 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.24 | 54.76 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.12 | 138.08 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.65 | 95.49 | 205% |