Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGAX vs PGNAX
FFGAX vs PGNAX Comparison
Open Charts FFGAX vs PGNAX
FFGAX vs PGNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGAX vs. PGNAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGAX is a Hold and PGNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGAX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. PGNAX (1.01B). FFGAX pays higher dividends than PGNAX: FFGAX (1.88) vs PGNAX (0.84). FFGAX was incepted earlier than PGNAX: FFGAX (17 years) vs PGNAX (37 years). PGNAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FFGAX (1.14). FFGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PGNAX (57.00). FFGAX (6%) and PGNAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FFGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGNAX: FFGAX (0) vs PGNAX (1000). PGNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.80 vs. FFGAX (46.97). PGNAX return over 5 years is better than : 144.71 vs. FFGAX (117.43).
| FFGAX | PGNAX | FFGAX / PGNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.26 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.26 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.635 | 27.407 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 1.01B | 142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 0.84 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.97 | 56.80 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.33 | 73.73 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.43 | 144.71 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 201.57 | 172.76 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement