Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGCX vs FFGTX
FFGCX vs FFGTX Comparison
Open Charts FFGCX vs FFGTX
FFGCX vs FFGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGCX vs. FFGTX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGCX is a Hold and FFGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGCX (1.58B) and FFGTX (1.58B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FFGCX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: FFGCX (1.95) vs FFGTX (1.56). FFGCX was incepted earlier than FFGTX: FFGCX (17 years) vs FFGTX (17 years). FFGTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FFGCX (0.85). FFGCX (78.00) and FFGTX (78.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGCX (0) and FFGTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFGCX (500) and FFGTX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FFGCX (43.86) and FFGTX (43.10) have marching annual gain over last year. FFGCX return over 5 years is better than : 111.92 vs. FFGTX (106.37).
| FFGCX | FFGTX | FFGCX / FFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.39 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.39 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.128 | 30.653 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 1.58B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 1.56 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.86 | 43.10 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.88 | 65.23 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.92 | 106.37 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.87 | 217.62 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement