Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGCX vs FRNRX
FFGCX vs FRNRX Comparison
Open Charts FFGCX vs FRNRX
FFGCX vs FRNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGCX vs. FRNRX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGCX is a Hold and FRNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGCX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. FRNRX (503M). FFGCX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: FFGCX (2.25) vs FRNRX (1.47). FFGCX was incepted earlier than FRNRX: FFGCX (17 years) vs FRNRX (31 years). FRNRX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FFGCX (0.85). FFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FFGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRNRX: FFGCX (0) vs FRNRX (1000). FRNRX (40.57) and FFGCX (38.69) have marching annual gain over last year. FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 138.08 vs. FFGCX (99.80).
| FFGCX | FRNRX | FFGCX / FRNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.00 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.01 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.670 | 20.066 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 503M | 262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 1.47 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.69 | 40.57 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.52 | 54.76 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.80 | 138.08 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 200.17 | 95.49 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement