Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGIX vs FRNRX
FFGIX vs FRNRX Comparison
Open Charts FFGIX vs FRNRX
FFGIX vs FRNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGIX vs. FRNRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGIX is a Hold and FRNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGIX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. FRNRX (555M). FFGIX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: FFGIX (1.88) vs FRNRX (1.30). FFGIX was incepted earlier than FRNRX: FFGIX (17 years) vs FRNRX (31 years). FRNRX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FFGIX (0.89). FFGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FRNRX (27.09). FFGIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRNRX: FFGIX (0) vs FRNRX (1000). FFGIX (44.07) and FRNRX (43.16) have marching annual gain over last year. FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 157.66 vs. FFGIX (116.48).
| FFGIX | FRNRX | FFGIX / FRNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.96 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.97 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.422 | 29.483 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 555M | 285% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.30 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.07 | 43.16 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.23 | 64.82 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.48 | 157.66 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 226.08 | 110.74 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement