Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGIX vs FRNRX
FFGIX vs FRNRX Comparison
Open Charts FFGIX vs FRNRX
FFGIX vs FRNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGIX vs. FRNRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGIX is a Hold and FRNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGIX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. FRNRX (555M). FFGIX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: FFGIX (2.03) vs FRNRX (1.42). FFGIX was incepted earlier than FRNRX: FFGIX (17 years) vs FRNRX (31 years). FRNRX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FFGIX (0.89). FFGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FFGIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRNRX: FFGIX (0) vs FRNRX (1000). FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.14 vs. FFGIX (47.34). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 174.73 vs. FFGIX (120.35).
| FFGIX | FRNRX | FFGIX / FRNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.00 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.01 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.844 | 31.426 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 555M | 257% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.42 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.34 | 53.14 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.73 | 75.22 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 120.35 | 174.73 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.91 | 104.19 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement