Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGRX vs WCMLX
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FFGRX vs WCMLX
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGRX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGRX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). FFGRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FFGRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FFGRX (15 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FFGRX (1.15). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FFGRX (45.00). FFGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FFGRX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. FFGRX (-4.31). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. FFGRX (-30.69).
| FFGRX | WCMLX | FFGRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.99 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.79 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.648 | 3.852 | -225% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 47.2M | 2,994% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.31 | 2.81 | -154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.91 | 23.40 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.69 | -7.51 | 409% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement