Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGRX vs WCMLX
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FFGRX vs WCMLX
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGRX has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. WCMLX (52.4M). FFGRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FFGRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FFGRX (15 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FFGRX (1.15). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FFGRX (45.00). FFGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FFGRX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). FFGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.35 vs. WCMLX (25.84). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. FFGRX (-2.24).
| FFGRX | WCMLX | FFGRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.99 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.79 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.094 | 9.375 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 52.4M | 2,838% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.35 | 25.84 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.42 | 32.13 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.24 | -0.07 | 3,372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement