Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGRX vs WCMNX
FFGRX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FFGRX vs WCMNX
FFGRX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGRX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGRX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGRX has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. WCMNX (53.1M). FFGRX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FFGRX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FFGRX (15 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FFGRX (1.15). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FFGRX (45.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFGRX: WCMNX (1000) vs FFGRX (2000). FFGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.35 vs. WCMNX (25.42). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -1.40 vs. FFGRX (-2.24).
| FFGRX | WCMNX | FFGRX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.24 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 2.04 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.094 | 9.225 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 53.1M | 2,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.35 | 25.42 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.42 | 31.21 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.24 | -1.40 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement