Ad is loading...
FFGTX vs FMFAX
FFGTX vs FMFAX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs FMFAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$17.12
Change+$1.11 (+6.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets876.47M
Fidelity Advisor Materials A
Price$80.23
Change+$6.30 (+8.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets721.19M
FFGTX vs FMFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. FMFAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and FMFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 876M vs. FMFAX (721M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than FMFAX: FFGTX (1.87) vs FMFAX (0.75). FFGTX was incepted earlier than FMFAX: FFGTX (16 years) vs FMFAX (18 years). FFGTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FMFAX (0.99). FMFAX (51.00) and FFGTX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. FMFAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFGTX (4%) vs FFGTX (4%). FFGTX (0) and FMFAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.33 vs. FMFAX (-29.72). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 84.45 vs. FMFAX (35.10).
| FFGTX | FMFAX | FFGTX / FMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.99 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.99 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.808 | -11.419 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 876M | 721M | 121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 0.75 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.33 | -29.72 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.53 | -30.18 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.45 | 35.10 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.71 | -2.48 | -1,640% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers