Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs FNCSX
FFGTX vs FNCSX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs FNCSX
FFGTX vs FNCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. FNCSX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a StrongBuy and FNCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. FNCSX (532M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than FNCSX: FFGTX (1.66) vs FNCSX (1.49). FFGTX was incepted earlier than FNCSX: FFGTX (17 years) vs FNCSX (13 years). FFGTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FNCSX (0.68). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FNCSX (19.72). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCSX: FFGTX (0) vs FNCSX (1000000). FNCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.38 vs. FFGTX (42.37). FNCSX return over 5 years is better than : 119.47 vs. FFGTX (79.11).
| FFGTX | FNCSX | FFGTX / FNCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.63 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.68 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.746 | 22.409 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 532M | 275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.49 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.37 | 48.38 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.03 | 73.00 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.11 | 119.47 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 204.75 | 108.08 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement