Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs FNCSX
FFGTX vs FNCSX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs FNCSX
FFGTX vs FNCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. FNCSX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and FNCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. FNCSX (503M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than FNCSX: FFGTX (1.80) vs FNCSX (1.59). FFGTX was incepted earlier than FNCSX: FFGTX (17 years) vs FNCSX (13 years). FFGTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FNCSX (0.68). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FNCSX (19.72). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCSX: FFGTX (0) vs FNCSX (1000000). FNCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.06 vs. FFGTX (37.95). FNCSX return over 5 years is better than : 142.69 vs. FFGTX (94.61).
| FFGTX | FNCSX | FFGTX / FNCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.63 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.68 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.324 | 20.301 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 503M | 262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.59 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.95 | 41.06 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.09 | 56.55 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.61 | 142.69 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.72 | 101.15 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement