Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs FNRAX
FFGTX vs FNRAX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs FNRAX
FFGTX vs FNRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. FNRAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and FNRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. FNRAX (500M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than FNRAX: FFGTX (1.69) vs FNRAX (1.47). FFGTX was incepted earlier than FNRAX: FFGTX (17 years) vs FNRAX (30 years). FFGTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FNRAX (0.76). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FNRAX (19.72). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNRAX: FFGTX (0) vs FNRAX (100000). FNRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.04 vs. FFGTX (39.95). FNRAX return over 5 years is better than : 134.33 vs. FFGTX (86.18).
| FFGTX | FNRAX | FFGTX / FNRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.75 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.76 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.369 | 19.246 | 101% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 500M | 286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.47 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.95 | 43.04 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.69 | 54.79 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.18 | 134.33 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.68 | 100.54 | 187% |