Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs GRHAX
FFGTX vs GRHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs GRHAX
FFGTX vs GRHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. GRHAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and GRHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. GRHAX (969M). GRHAX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: GRHAX (3.20) vs FFGTX (1.80). FFGTX was incepted earlier than GRHAX: FFGTX (17 years) vs GRHAX (10 years). GRHAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.39). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. GRHAX (24.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRHAX: FFGTX (0) vs GRHAX (3000). GRHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.55 vs. FFGTX (30.88). GRHAX return over 5 years is better than : 144.00 vs. FFGTX (79.02).
| FFGTX | GRHAX | FFGTX / GRHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.28 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.52 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.705 | 2.842 | 517% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 969M | 136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 3.20 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.88 | 32.55 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.34 | 79.47 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.02 | 144.00 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement