Ad is loading...
FFGTX vs INRSX
FFGTX vs INRSX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs INRSX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$18.00
Change-$0.76 (-4.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets876.47M
Macquarie Natural Resources R6
Price$15.29
Change-$0.80 (-4.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.89M
FFGTX vs INRSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. INRSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a StrongBuy and INRSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 876M vs. INRSX (169M). INRSX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: INRSX (5.60) vs FFGTX (1.87). FFGTX was incepted earlier than INRSX: FFGTX (16 years) vs INRSX (11 years). FFGTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than INRSX (1.10). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. INRSX (37.00). FFGTX (0) and INRSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.00 vs. INRSX (-2.12). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 141.36 vs. INRSX (124.94).
| FFGTX | INRSX | FFGTX / INRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.95 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.10 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.290 | 1.658 | 259% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 876M | 169M | 518% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 5.60 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.00 | -2.12 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.93 | -2.62 | 303% |
| Returns for 5 years | 141.36 | 124.94 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.73 | 12.79 | 537% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...