Ad is loading...
FFGTX vs INRSX
FFGTX vs INRSX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs INRSX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$18.67
Change+$0.17 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.72M
Macquarie Natural Resources R6
Price$16.71
Change+$0.10 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.42M
FFGTX vs INRSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. INRSX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a StrongBuy and INRSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 882M vs. INRSX (179M). INRSX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: INRSX (2.31) vs FFGTX (1.41). FFGTX was incepted earlier than INRSX: FFGTX (16 years) vs INRSX (10 years). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. INRSX (48.00). FFGTX (0) and INRSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. INRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.07 vs. FFGTX (14.08). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 59.97 vs. INRSX (44.04).
| FFGTX | INRSX | FFGTX / INRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.011 | 6.569 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 179M | 493% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 2.31 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 16.07 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.10 | 23.69 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.97 | 44.04 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.69 | 27.65 | 238% |