Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs MCGRX
FFGTX vs MCGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs MCGRX
FFGTX vs MCGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. MCGRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a StrongBuy and MCGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. MCGRX (211M). MCGRX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: MCGRX (2.32) vs FFGTX (1.66). FFGTX was incepted earlier than MCGRX: FFGTX (17 years) vs MCGRX (32 years). MCGRX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.39). MCGRX (79.00) and FFGTX (78.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGRX: FFGTX (0) vs MCGRX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.30 vs. MCGRX (22.72). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 82.69 vs. MCGRX (17.92).
| FFGTX | MCGRX | FFGTX / MCGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.88 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.88 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.790 | 16.101 | 142% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 211M | 693% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 2.32 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.30 | 22.72 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.37 | 24.61 | 278% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.69 | 17.92 | 461% |
| Returns for 10 years | 203.80 | -20.07 | -1,015% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers