Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs MDGRX
FFGTX vs MDGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs MDGRX
FFGTX vs MDGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. MDGRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and MDGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. MDGRX (206M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than MDGRX: FFGTX (1.69) vs MDGRX (1.42). FFGTX was incepted earlier than MDGRX: FFGTX (17 years) vs MDGRX (32 years). FFGTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MDGRX (1.16). MDGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFGTX (78.00). MDGRX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFGTX (4%) vs FFGTX (4%). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDGRX: FFGTX (0) vs MDGRX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.61 vs. MDGRX (31.26). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 114.60 vs. MDGRX (57.31).
| FFGTX | MDGRX | FFGTX / MDGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.16 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.16 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.432 | 17.369 | 164% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 206M | 694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.42 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.61 | 31.26 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.02 | 36.68 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.60 | 57.31 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.71 | 7.30 | 2,696% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers