Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs MDGRX
FFGTX vs MDGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs MDGRX
FFGTX vs MDGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. MDGRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and MDGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. MDGRX (197M). FFGTX (1.66) and MDGRX (1.66) have matching dividends . FFGTX was incepted earlier than MDGRX: FFGTX (17 years) vs MDGRX (32 years). FFGTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MDGRX (1.16). MDGRX (79.00) and FFGTX (78.00) have comparable annual turnover. MDGRX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFGTX (4%) vs FFGTX (4%). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDGRX: FFGTX (0) vs MDGRX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.84 vs. MDGRX (19.40). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 77.31 vs. MDGRX (32.88).
| FFGTX | MDGRX | FFGTX / MDGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.16 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.16 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.682 | 9.013 | 174% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 197M | 742% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.66 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.84 | 19.40 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.91 | 28.69 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.31 | 32.88 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.55 | 5.36 | 3,593% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers