Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and PNRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. PNRCX (906M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRCX: FFGTX (1.69) vs PNRCX (0.67). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs PNRCX (32 years). PNRCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.39). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PNRCX (57.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNRCX: FFGTX (0) vs PNRCX (1000). PNRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.16 vs. FFGTX (39.95). PNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 94.80 vs. FFGTX (86.18).
| FFGTX | PNRCX | FFGTX / PNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.03 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.03 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.369 | 13.785 | 141% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 906M | 158% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.67 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.95 | 42.16 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.69 | 46.17 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.18 | 94.80 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.68 | 143.27 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers