Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and PNRCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. PNRCX (899M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRCX: FFGTX (1.80) vs PNRCX (0.67). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs PNRCX (32 years). PNRCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.39). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PNRCX (57.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNRCX: FFGTX (0) vs PNRCX (1000). PNRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.85 vs. FFGTX (30.88). PNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 91.23 vs. FFGTX (79.02).
| FFGTX | PNRCX | FFGTX / PNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.03 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.03 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.705 | 11.733 | 125% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 899M | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.67 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.88 | 37.85 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.34 | 49.36 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.02 | 91.23 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.23 | 130.59 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement