Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRZX
FFGTX vs PNRZX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRZX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$20.74
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.5M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Z
Price$62.62
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.64M
FFGTX vs PNRZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRZX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and PNRZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. PNRZX (714M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRZX: FFGTX (1.67) vs PNRZX (1.09). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRZX: FFGTX (16 years) vs PNRZX (29 years). FFGTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than PNRZX (0.92). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PNRZX (31.00). FFGTX (0) and PNRZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.25 vs. PNRZX (9.61). PNRZX return over 5 years is better than : 130.40 vs. FFGTX (100.43).
| FFGTX | PNRZX | FFGTX / PNRZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.92 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.92 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.710 | 16.820 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 714M | 125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.09 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.25 | 9.61 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.20 | 19.64 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.43 | 130.40 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.00 | 112.76 | 114% |