Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRZX
FFGTX vs PNRZX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRZX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$18.81
Change+$0.18 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets834.61M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Z
Price$56.21
Change+$0.95 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets625.97M
FFGTX vs PNRZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRZX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and PNRZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 835M vs. PNRZX (626M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRZX: FFGTX (1.94) vs PNRZX (1.30). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRZX: FFGTX (16 years) vs PNRZX (29 years). FFGTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than PNRZX (0.92). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PNRZX (31.00). FFGTX (0) and PNRZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.38 vs. PNRZX (-7.27). PNRZX return over 5 years is better than : 143.00 vs. FFGTX (102.42).
| FFGTX | PNRZX | FFGTX / PNRZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.92 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.92 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.067 | 4.027 | 101% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 835M | 626M | 133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.30 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.38 | -7.27 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.46 | -1.02 | 437% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.42 | 143.00 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.11 | 45.17 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement