Ad is loading...
FFGTX vs RSNRX
FFGTX vs RSNRX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs RSNRX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$17.12
Change+$1.11 (+6.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets876.47M
Victory Global Energy Transition A
Price$27.37
Change+$1.96 (+7.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.47M
FFGTX vs RSNRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. RSNRX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and RSNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 876M vs. RSNRX (255M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than RSNRX: FFGTX (1.87) vs RSNRX (1.73). FFGTX was incepted earlier than RSNRX: FFGTX (16 years) vs RSNRX (29 years). RSNRX (1.55) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and RSNRX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSNRX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFGTX (4%) vs FFGTX (4%). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSNRX: FFGTX (0) vs RSNRX (2500). RSNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.72 vs. FFGTX (-16.33). RSNRX return over 5 years is better than : 374.46 vs. FFGTX (84.45).
| FFGTX | RSNRX | FFGTX / RSNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.48 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.55 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.808 | -17.580 | 61% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 876M | 255M | 344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.73 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.33 | -14.72 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.53 | -18.23 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.45 | 374.46 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.71 | 2.83 | 1,436% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers