Ad is loading...
FFHCX vs TRIZX
FFHCX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.04B vs. FFHCX (252M). FFHCX pays higher dividends than TRIZX: FFHCX (9.08) vs TRIZX (8.63). FFHCX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: FFHCX (14 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). TRIZX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FFHCX (0.03). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. FFHCX (43.00). FFHCX (0) and TRIZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.19 vs. FFHCX (5.99). FFHCX (47.14) and TRIZX (45.19) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFHCX | TRIZX | FFHCX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.62 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.859 | -0.043 | 2,019% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 4.04B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.08 | 8.63 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.99 | 7.19 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.51 | 24.24 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.14 | 45.19 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...