Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFHCX vs TRIZX
FFHCX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.36B vs. FFHCX (260M). FFHCX pays higher dividends than TRIZX: FFHCX (8.58) vs TRIZX (8.00). FFHCX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: FFHCX (14 years) vs TRIZX (6 years). TRIZX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FFHCX (0.03). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. FFHCX (43.00). FFHCX (0) and TRIZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. FFHCX (7.56). TRIZX (41.35) and FFHCX (41.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFHCX | TRIZX | FFHCX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.61 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.884 | 4.913 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 260M | 4.36B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.58 | 8.00 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 8.23 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.72 | 31.83 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.28 | 41.35 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement