Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFHCX vs TRIZX
FFHCX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.17B vs. FFHCX (250M). FFHCX pays higher dividends than TRIZX: FFHCX (9.06) vs TRIZX (8.56). FFHCX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: FFHCX (14 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). TRIZX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FFHCX (0.03). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. FFHCX (43.00). FFHCX (0) and TRIZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. FFHCX (6.73). FFHCX (46.24) and TRIZX (44.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFHCX | TRIZX | FFHCX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.62 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.604 | 1.709 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 250M | 4.17B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.06 | 8.56 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.73 | 7.90 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.78 | 30.07 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.24 | 44.71 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.11 | N/A | - |