Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFHCX vs TRIZX
FFHCX vs TRIZX Comparison
Open Charts FFHCX vs TRIZX
FFHCX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFHCX vs. TRIZX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFHCX is a Hold and TRIZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.01B vs. FFHCX (278M). TRIZX (7.56) and FFHCX (7.55) have matching dividends . FFHCX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: FFHCX (15 years) vs TRIZX (6 years). TRIZX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FFHCX (0.03). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.40 vs. FFHCX (53.00). FFHCX (0) and TRIZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.35 vs. TRIZX (5.92). TRIZX (39.62) and FFHCX (38.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFHCX | TRIZX | FFHCX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.61 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.378 | 2.658 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 278M | 4.01B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.55 | 7.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.35 | 5.92 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.46 | 26.88 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.43 | 39.62 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement