Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFICX vs RWMFX
FFICX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FFICX vs RWMFX
FFICX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFICX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFICX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FFICX (187B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FFICX: RWMFX (1.41) vs FFICX (1.08). FFICX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FFICX (10 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FFICX (0.27). FFICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFICX: RWMFX (250) vs FFICX (1000000). FFICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. RWMFX (2.09). FFICX return over 5 years is better than : 40.47 vs. RWMFX (27.39).
| FFICX | RWMFX | FFICX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.165 | 4.508 | 226% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 187B | 218B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.41 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.29 | 2.09 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.86 | 30.24 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.47 | 27.39 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers