Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFICX vs RWMFX
FFICX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FFICX vs RWMFX
FFICX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFICX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFICX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. FFICX (179B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FFICX: RWMFX (1.40) vs FFICX (1.07). FFICX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FFICX (9 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FFICX (0.27). FFICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFICX: RWMFX (250) vs FFICX (1000000). FFICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.34 vs. RWMFX (8.10). FFICX return over 5 years is better than : 47.43 vs. RWMFX (26.71).
| FFICX | RWMFX | FFICX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.016 | 5.575 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179B | 214B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.40 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.34 | 8.10 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.30 | 33.11 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.43 | 26.71 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement