Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFICX vs RWMFX
FFICX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FFICX vs RWMFX
FFICX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFICX vs. RWMFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFICX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FFICX (186B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FFICX: RWMFX (1.42) vs FFICX (1.09). FFICX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FFICX (10 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FFICX (0.27). FFICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFICX: RWMFX (250) vs FFICX (1000000). FFICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.58 vs. RWMFX (7.53). FFICX return over 5 years is better than : 43.52 vs. RWMFX (29.34).
| FFICX | RWMFX | FFICX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.145 | 6.626 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 186B | 218B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.42 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.58 | 7.53 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.02 | 34.20 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.52 | 29.34 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers