Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFICX vs RWMFX
FFICX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FFICX vs RWMFX
FFICX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFICX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFICX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. FFICX (184B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FFICX: RWMFX (1.44) vs FFICX (1.09). FFICX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FFICX (9 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FFICX (0.27). FFICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFICX: RWMFX (250) vs FFICX (1000000). FFICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. RWMFX (5.76). FFICX return over 5 years is better than : 42.67 vs. RWMFX (28.02).
| FFICX | RWMFX | FFICX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.169 | 3.858 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 184B | 219B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.44 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.82 | 5.76 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.18 | 29.17 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.67 | 28.02 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement