Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFIDX vs RGACX
FFIDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FFIDX vs RGACX
FFIDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFIDX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIDX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FFIDX (9.28B). FFIDX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FFIDX (0.48) vs RGACX (0.00). FFIDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FFIDX (96 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFIDX (0.42). FFIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FFIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FFIDX (0) vs RGACX (250). FFIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. RGACX (-0.53). FFIDX return over 5 years is better than : 58.91 vs. RGACX (10.82).
| FFIDX | RGACX | FFIDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.93 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.93 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 96 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.907 | 8.819 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.30 | -0.53 | -1,563% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.56 | 40.68 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.91 | 10.82 | 544% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.28 | 101.31 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers