Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFIDX vs RGACX
FFIDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FFIDX vs RGACX
FFIDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFIDX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIDX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FFIDX (8.93B). FFIDX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FFIDX (0.39) vs RGACX (0.00). FFIDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FFIDX (96 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFIDX (0.42). RGACX (32.00) and FFIDX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FFIDX (0) vs RGACX (250). FFIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.76 vs. RGACX (3.68). FFIDX return over 5 years is better than : 60.93 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| FFIDX | RGACX | FFIDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.93 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.93 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 96 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.488 | 6.959 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.93B | 357B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.76 | 3.68 | 428% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.71 | 37.13 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.93 | 13.46 | 453% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.64 | 97.58 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement