Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFIDX vs RGAFX
FFIDX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FFIDX vs RGAFX
FFIDX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFIDX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIDX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FFIDX (9.28B). FFIDX (0.48) and RGAFX (0.46) have matching dividends . FFIDX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FFIDX (96 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FFIDX (0.42) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FFIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). FFIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FFIDX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FFIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. RGAFX (0.42). FFIDX return over 5 years is better than : 58.91 vs. RGAFX (14.74).
| FFIDX | RGAFX | FFIDX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.34 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.34 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 96 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.907 | 9.276 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.46 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.30 | 0.42 | 1,984% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.56 | 44.36 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.91 | 14.74 | 400% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.28 | 109.80 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers