Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFIMX vs RLBAX
FFIMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFIMX vs RLBAX
FFIMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFIMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FFIMX (10.9B). FFIMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFIMX (2.04) vs RLBAX (1.12). FFIMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFIMX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FFIMX (0.60). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFIMX (25.00). FFIMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFIMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.31 vs. RLBAX (5.83). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. FFIMX (16.43).
| FFIMX | RLBAX | FFIMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.32 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.32 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.500 | 7.935 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 285B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 1.12 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.31 | 5.83 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.37 | 38.21 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.43 | 27.39 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.44 | 75.00 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement