It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FFIV’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FFIV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FFIV (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.52% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.61%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.
FFIV is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
LW is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.34% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
FFIV | LW | FFIV / LW | |
Capitalization | 11.2B | 15.4B | 73% |
EBITDA | 725M | 1.34B | 54% |
Gain YTD | 19.346 | -27.165 | -71% |
P/E Ratio | 24.75 | 13.62 | 182% |
Revenue | 2.81B | 6.35B | 44% |
Total Cash | 826M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 276M | 3.63B | 8% |
FFIV | LW | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LW's Valuation (34) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FFIV (66) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.
LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FFIV (46) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LW (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew somewhat faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.
LW's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FFIV (19) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV | LW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago54% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago40% | 1 day ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago63% | 5 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago55% | 1 day ago55% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago63% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ARKZ | 39.27 | 1.84 | +4.91% |
ARK 21Shares Active Ethereum FutsStgyETF | |||
SABA | 9.26 | 0.16 | +1.76% |
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II | |||
PGZ | 10.46 | 0.05 | +0.48% |
PRINCIPAL REAL ESTATE Income FUND | |||
GEND | 10.89 | 0.02 | +0.15% |
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF | |||
INFL | 41.49 | -0.14 | -0.34% |
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Bnfcrs ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIV has been loosely correlated with CVLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFIV jumps, then CVLT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FFIV | 100% | -0.68% | ||
CVLT - FFIV | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
CPAY - FFIV | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
TENB - FFIV | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
ADSK - FFIV | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
SHOP - FFIV | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.