Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLC vs SPY
FFLC vs SPY Comparison
Open Charts FFLC vs SPY
FFLC vs SPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLC vs. SPY commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLC is a Buy and SPY is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPY has more net assets: 795B vs. FFLC (1.2B). FFLC (10.631) and SPY (10.130) have matching annual dividend yield . FFLC was incepted earlier than SPY: FFLC (6 years) vs SPY (34 years). SPY (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than FFLC (0.38). FFLC has a higher turnover SPY (3.00) vs SPY (3.00).
| FFLC | SPY | FFLC / SPY | |
| Gain YTD | 10.631 | 10.130 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 795B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.09 | 402% |
| Turnover | 46.00 | 3.00 | 1,533% |
| Yield | 0.99 | 1.01 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 34 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLC | SPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 11 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLC has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLC jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLC | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| TSM - FFLC | 73% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| NVDA - FFLC | 68% Closely correlated | +2.93% | ||
| MS - FFLC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| ETN - FFLC | 63% Loosely correlated | +7.32% | ||
| VRT - FFLC | 57% Loosely correlated | +6.18% | ||
More | ||||
SPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPY has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPY jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPY | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| MSFT - SPY | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| AAPL - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.35% | ||
| AVGO - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| AMZN - SPY | 60% Loosely correlated | +15.32% | ||
| META - SPY | 59% Loosely correlated | +3.28% | ||
More | ||||