Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLDX vs PDKGX
FFLDX vs PDKGX Comparison
Open Charts FFLDX vs PDKGX
FFLDX vs PDKGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLDX vs. PDKGX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLDX is a Hold and PDKGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLDX has more cash in the bank: 24.4B vs. PDKGX (12M). PDKGX pays higher dividends than FFLDX: PDKGX (2.31) vs FFLDX (1.72). FFLDX was incepted earlier than PDKGX: FFLDX (11 years) vs PDKGX (10 years). PDKGX (7.68) is less costly to investors than FFLDX (0.08). PDKGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FFLDX (13.00). PDKGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFLDX: PDKGX (0) vs FFLDX (5000000). FFLDX (22.28) and PDKGX (21.59) have marching annual gain over last year. FFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 62.65 vs. PDKGX (12.90).
| FFLDX | PDKGX | FFLDX / PDKGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.50 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 7.68 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.547 | 15.653 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.4B | 12M | 203,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 2.31 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.28 | 21.59 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.50 | 52.02 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.65 | 12.90 | 486% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement