Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLDX vs TRRNX
FFLDX vs TRRNX Comparison
Open Charts FFLDX vs TRRNX
FFLDX vs TRRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLDX vs. TRRNX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLDX is a Hold and TRRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLDX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. TRRNX (12.2B). FFLDX pays higher dividends than TRRNX: FFLDX (1.71) vs TRRNX (1.15). FFLDX was incepted earlier than TRRNX: FFLDX (11 years) vs TRRNX (19 years). TRRNX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FFLDX (0.08). FFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. TRRNX (11.00). TRRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFLDX: TRRNX (2500) vs FFLDX (5000000). FFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.43 vs. TRRNX (19.44). FFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 56.97 vs. TRRNX (29.08).
| FFLDX | TRRNX | FFLDX / TRRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.63 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.63 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.656 | 10.246 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 12.2B | 196% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.15 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.43 | 19.44 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.92 | 53.41 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.97 | 29.08 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.63 | 118.62 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers