Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs LBAY
FFLS vs LBAY Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs LBAY
FFLS vs LBAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. LBAY commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Buy and LBAY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 43.4M vs. LBAY (18.1M). LBAY has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: LBAY (8.068) vs FFLS (0.583). FFLS was incepted earlier than LBAY: FFLS (3 years) vs LBAY (6 years). LBAY (1.20) has a lower expense ratio than FFLS (1.60). FFLS has a higher turnover LBAY (67.00) vs LBAY (67.00).
| FFLS | LBAY | FFLS / LBAY | |
| Gain YTD | 0.583 | 8.068 | 7% |
| Net Assets | 43.4M | 18.1M | 240% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.20 | 133% |
| Turnover | 313.00 | 67.00 | 467% |
| Yield | 0.12 | 3.91 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | LBAY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 56% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FFLS and XYZ have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFLS and XYZ's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| XYZ - FFLS | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
| META - FFLS | 31% Poorly correlated | -4.90% | ||
| FND - FFLS | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
| ONON - FFLS | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.57% | ||
| UBER - FFLS | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.44% | ||
More | ||||
LBAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LBAY and AGI have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBAY and AGI's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBAY | 100% | +3.49% | ||
| AGI - LBAY | 20% Poorly correlated | +4.19% | ||
| RIO - LBAY | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| ABBV - LBAY | 17% Poorly correlated | +3.99% | ||
| DPZ - LBAY | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.46% | ||
| QSR - LBAY | 15% Poorly correlated | +4.66% | ||
More | ||||