Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMFX vs RGVGX
FFMFX vs RGVGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVGX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. FFMFX (12.2B). FFMFX (4.47) and RGVGX (4.37) have matching dividends . FFMFX was incepted earlier than RGVGX: FFMFX (5 years) vs RGVGX (17 years). FFMFX (0.48) is less costly to investors than RGVGX (0.29). FFMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 824.00 vs. RGVGX (50.00). FFMFX (250) and RGVGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. RGVGX (7.20). FFMFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.85 vs. RGVGX (-4.39).
| FFMFX | RGVGX | FFMFX / RGVGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.25 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.29 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.597 | 7.022 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 23.8B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.47 | 4.37 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 7.20 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.64 | 12.54 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.85 | -4.39 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement