Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMFX vs RGVGX
FFMFX vs RGVGX Comparison
Open Charts FFMFX vs RGVGX
FFMFX vs RGVGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVGX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. FFMFX (13.1B). FFMFX (4.41) and RGVGX (4.41) have matching dividends . FFMFX was incepted earlier than RGVGX: FFMFX (6 years) vs RGVGX (17 years). FFMFX (0.41) is less costly to investors than RGVGX (0.25). FFMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVGX (50.00). FFMFX (250) and RGVGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.83 vs. RGVGX (3.92). FFMFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.22 vs. RGVGX (0.40).
| FFMFX | RGVGX | FFMFX / RGVGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.25 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.25 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.256 | -0.490 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 24.3B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.41 | 4.41 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.83 | 3.92 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.25 | 11.34 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.22 | 0.40 | 559% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement