Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMFX vs RGVGX
FFMFX vs RGVGX Comparison
Open Charts FFMFX vs RGVGX
FFMFX vs RGVGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMFX vs. RGVGX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMFX is a Hold and RGVGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVGX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. FFMFX (12.9B). RGVGX (4.42) and FFMFX (4.38) have matching dividends . FFMFX was incepted earlier than RGVGX: FFMFX (6 years) vs RGVGX (17 years). FFMFX (0.41) is less costly to investors than RGVGX (0.25). FFMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVGX (50.00). FFMFX (250) and RGVGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.17 vs. RGVGX (-0.32). FFMFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.94 vs. RGVGX (-1.03).
| FFMFX | RGVGX | FFMFX / RGVGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.25 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.25 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.302 | -1.418 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 24B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.38 | 4.42 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.17 | -0.32 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.30 | 12.32 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.94 | -1.03 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers