Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMFX vs RMAFX
FFMFX vs RMAFX Comparison
Open Charts FFMFX vs RMAFX
FFMFX vs RMAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMFX vs. RMAFX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMFX is a Hold and RMAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMFX (12.9B) and RMAFX (12.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RMAFX (4.46) and FFMFX (4.38) have matching dividends . FFMFX was incepted earlier than RMAFX: FFMFX (6 years) vs RMAFX (16 years). FFMFX (0.41) is less costly to investors than RMAFX (0.32). FFMFX (58.00) and RMAFX (58.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFMFX (250) and RMAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.25 vs. FFMFX (0.17). RMAFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.43 vs. FFMFX (0.94).
| FFMFX | RMAFX | FFMFX / RMAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.32 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.32 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.302 | -1.247 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 12.9B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.38 | 4.46 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.17 | 0.25 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.30 | 13.60 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.94 | 1.43 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement