Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs FSWCX
FFMMX vs FSWCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs FSWCX
FFMMX vs FSWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. FSWCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and FSWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FSWCX (9.89B). FSWCX pays higher dividends than FFMMX: FSWCX (1.77) vs FFMMX (1.63). FFMMX was incepted earlier than FSWCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs FSWCX (9 years). FFMMX (0.36) is less costly to investors than FSWCX (0.11). FSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FSWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: FSWCX (0) vs FFMMX (250). FSWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.33 vs. FFMMX (5.42). FSWCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.33 vs. FFMMX (39.64).
| FFMMX | FSWCX | FFMMX / FSWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.11 | 327% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.11 | 327% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.977 | 25.383 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 9.89B | 1,183% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.77 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 27.33 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 74.02 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | 63.33 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement