Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs GBCAX
FFMMX vs GBCAX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs GBCAX
FFMMX vs GBCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GBCAX (22.5M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: FFMMX (1.64) vs GBCAX (0.00). FFMMX was incepted earlier than GBCAX: FFMMX (6 years) vs GBCAX (23 years). GBCAX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). GBCAX (31.00) and FFMMX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: FFMMX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.76 vs. GBCAX (7.43). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.13 vs. GBCAX (-1.75).
| FFMMX | GBCAX | FFMMX / GBCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.94 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.94 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.858 | 10.846 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 22.5M | 524,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | 7.43 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.53 | 12.92 | 275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.13 | -1.75 | -2,353% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement