Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs GBCAX
FFMMX vs GBCAX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs GBCAX
FFMMX vs GBCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. GBCAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and GBCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GBCAX (22.7M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: FFMMX (1.63) vs GBCAX (0.00). FFMMX was incepted earlier than GBCAX: FFMMX (6 years) vs GBCAX (23 years). GBCAX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). GBCAX (31.00) and FFMMX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: FFMMX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. GBCAX (4.24). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.64 vs. GBCAX (-0.34).
| FFMMX | GBCAX | FFMMX / GBCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.94 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.94 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.977 | 11.811 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 22.7M | 515,419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 4.24 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 19.56 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | -0.34 | -11,590% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement