Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs GBCCX
FFMMX vs GBCCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs GBCCX
FFMMX vs GBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GBCCX (22.5M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: FFMMX (1.64) vs GBCCX (0.00). FFMMX was incepted earlier than GBCCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs GBCCX (23 years). GBCCX (2.69) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). GBCCX (31.00) and FFMMX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: FFMMX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.76 vs. GBCCX (6.59). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.13 vs. GBCCX (-6.84).
| FFMMX | GBCCX | FFMMX / GBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 2.69 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 2.69 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.858 | 10.331 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 22.5M | 524,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | 6.59 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.53 | 10.41 | 341% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.13 | -6.84 | -601% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement