Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs GBCIX
FFMMX vs GBCIX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs GBCIX
FFMMX vs GBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GBCIX (22.1M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: FFMMX (1.65) vs GBCIX (0.76). FFMMX was incepted earlier than GBCIX: FFMMX (6 years) vs GBCIX (22 years). GBCIX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). GBCIX (31.00) and FFMMX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: FFMMX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.53 vs. GBCIX (4.69). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.28 vs. GBCIX (1.64).
| FFMMX | GBCIX | FFMMX / GBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.00 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.69 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.451 | 9.481 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 22.1M | 533,937% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.76 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 4.69 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | 16.29 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.28 | 1.64 | 2,512% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement