Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs GBCIX
FFMMX vs GBCIX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs GBCIX
FFMMX vs GBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. GBCIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and GBCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GBCIX (22.7M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: FFMMX (1.63) vs GBCIX (0.73). FFMMX was incepted earlier than GBCIX: FFMMX (6 years) vs GBCIX (22 years). GBCIX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). GBCIX (31.00) and FFMMX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: FFMMX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). FFMMX (5.42) and GBCIX (5.18) have marching annual gain over last year. FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.64 vs. GBCIX (4.63).
| FFMMX | GBCIX | FFMMX / GBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.00 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.69 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.977 | 12.585 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 22.7M | 515,419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.73 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 5.18 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 23.03 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | 4.63 | 856% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement