Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs GBCIX
FFMMX vs GBCIX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs GBCIX
FFMMX vs GBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. GBCIX (21.8M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: FFMMX (1.67) vs GBCIX (0.77). FFMMX was incepted earlier than GBCIX: FFMMX (6 years) vs GBCIX (22 years). GBCIX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). GBCIX (31.00) and FFMMX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: FFMMX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). FFMMX (10.79) and GBCIX (10.51) have marching annual gain over last year. FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. GBCIX (-1.43).
| FFMMX | GBCIX | FFMMX / GBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.00 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.69 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.096 | 7.280 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 21.8M | 527,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.77 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 10.51 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.07 | 17.87 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.79 | -1.43 | -2,643% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers