Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs HDGBX
FFMMX vs HDGBX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs HDGBX
FFMMX vs HDGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGBX (3.47B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than HDGBX: FFMMX (1.67) vs HDGBX (1.06). FFMMX was incepted earlier than HDGBX: FFMMX (6 years) vs HDGBX (28 years). HDGBX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). HDGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: HDGBX (0) vs FFMMX (250). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.97 vs. HDGBX (3.37). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.69 vs. HDGBX (0.87).
| FFMMX | HDGBX | FFMMX / HDGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.91 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.91 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.210 | 8.765 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 3.47B | 3,369% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.06 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.97 | 3.37 | 296% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.90 | 11.46 | 322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.69 | 0.87 | 4,464% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement