Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs HDGCX
FFMMX vs HDGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs HDGCX
FFMMX vs HDGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. HDGCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and HDGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGCX (18.5B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: FFMMX (1.63) vs HDGCX (0.29). FFMMX was incepted earlier than HDGCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs HDGCX (28 years). HDGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). HDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: FFMMX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). HDGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. FFMMX (5.42). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.64 vs. HDGCX (18.83).
| FFMMX | HDGCX | FFMMX / HDGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.74 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.74 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.977 | 12.908 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 18.5B | 632% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.29 | 558% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 6.50 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 26.35 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | 18.83 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers