Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs HDGCX
FFMMX vs HDGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs HDGCX
FFMMX vs HDGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGCX (18.8B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: FFMMX (1.64) vs HDGCX (0.30). FFMMX was incepted earlier than HDGCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs HDGCX (28 years). HDGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). HDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: FFMMX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). HDGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.21 vs. FFMMX (9.76). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.13 vs. HDGCX (19.96).
| FFMMX | HDGCX | FFMMX / HDGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.74 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.74 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.858 | 12.692 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 18.8B | 628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | 12.21 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.53 | 22.83 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.13 | 19.96 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement