Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs HDGRX
FFMMX vs HDGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs HDGRX
FFMMX vs HDGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. HDGRX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Hold and HDGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGRX (18.8B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than HDGRX: FFMMX (1.63) vs HDGRX (0.53). FFMMX was incepted earlier than HDGRX: FFMMX (6 years) vs HDGRX (20 years). HDGRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). HDGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). HDGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: HDGRX (0) vs FFMMX (250). HDGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.56 vs. FFMMX (7.07). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.45 vs. HDGRX (25.13).
| FFMMX | HDGRX | FFMMX / HDGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.35 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.35 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.824 | 14.500 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 18.8B | 622% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.53 | 307% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.07 | 10.56 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.92 | 31.38 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.45 | 25.13 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement