Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs HIGCX
FFMMX vs HIGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs HIGCX
FFMMX vs HIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. HIGCX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Hold and HIGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HIGCX (485M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than HIGCX: FFMMX (1.63) vs HIGCX (0.40). FFMMX was incepted earlier than HIGCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs HIGCX (31 years). HIGCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). HIGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HIGCX: FFMMX (250) vs HIGCX (1000). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.17 vs. HIGCX (-6.93). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.04 vs. HIGCX (-15.70).
| FFMMX | HIGCX | FFMMX / HIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.71 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.71 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.407 | 9.060 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 485M | 24,124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.40 | 407% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.17 | -6.93 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.57 | -1.50 | -2,372% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.04 | -15.70 | -242% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers