Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs HWLZX
FFMMX vs HWLZX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs HWLZX
FFMMX vs HWLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWLZX (375M). HWLZX (1.70) and FFMMX (1.64) have matching dividends . FFMMX was incepted earlier than HWLZX: FFMMX (6 years) vs HWLZX (7 years). HWLZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). HWLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: FFMMX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). HWLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.80 vs. FFMMX (9.76). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.13 vs. HWLZX (25.12).
| FFMMX | HWLZX | FFMMX / HWLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.85 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.85 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.858 | 11.398 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 375M | 31,467% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 1.70 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | 17.80 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.53 | 21.72 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.13 | 25.12 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement