Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs KDHAX
FFMMX vs KDHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs KDHAX
FFMMX vs KDHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. KDHAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and KDHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. KDHAX (849M). KDHAX pays higher dividends than FFMMX: KDHAX (3.47) vs FFMMX (1.63). FFMMX was incepted earlier than KDHAX: FFMMX (6 years) vs KDHAX (39 years). KDHAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). KDHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than KDHAX: FFMMX (250) vs KDHAX (1000). KDHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.43 vs. FFMMX (5.42). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.64 vs. KDHAX (15.09).
| FFMMX | KDHAX | FFMMX / KDHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.02 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.02 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.977 | 19.369 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 849M | 13,781% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 3.47 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 8.43 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 17.70 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | 15.09 | 263% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement