Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs KDHCX
FFMMX vs KDHCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs KDHCX
FFMMX vs KDHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. KDHCX (799M). KDHCX pays higher dividends than FFMMX: KDHCX (3.04) vs FFMMX (1.65). FFMMX was incepted earlier than KDHCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs KDHCX (31 years). KDHCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). KDHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than KDHCX: FFMMX (250) vs KDHCX (1000). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.53 vs. KDHCX (3.82). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.28 vs. KDHCX (4.58).
| FFMMX | KDHCX | FFMMX / KDHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.81 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.86 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.451 | 12.559 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 799M | 14,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 3.04 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 3.82 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | 9.62 | 387% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.28 | 4.58 | 900% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement