Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs KDHSX
FFMMX vs KDHSX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs KDHSX
FFMMX vs KDHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. KDHSX (799M). KDHSX pays higher dividends than FFMMX: KDHSX (4.01) vs FFMMX (1.65). FFMMX was incepted earlier than KDHSX: FFMMX (6 years) vs KDHSX (21 years). KDHSX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). KDHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than KDHSX: FFMMX (250) vs KDHSX (2500). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.53 vs. KDHSX (4.89). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.28 vs. KDHSX (10.06).
| FFMMX | KDHSX | FFMMX / KDHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.78 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.78 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.451 | 13.172 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 799M | 14,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 4.01 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 4.89 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | 13.02 | 286% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.28 | 10.06 | 410% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement