Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs LAAFX
FFMMX vs LAAFX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs LAAFX
FFMMX vs LAAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. LAAFX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and LAAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAAFX (6.76B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than LAAFX: FFMMX (1.63) vs LAAFX (0.97). FFMMX was incepted earlier than LAAFX: FFMMX (6 years) vs LAAFX (19 years). LAAFX (0.54) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: LAAFX (0) vs FFMMX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. FFMMX (5.30). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.69 vs. LAAFX (33.42).
| FFMMX | LAAFX | FFMMX / LAAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.54 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.54 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.638 | 12.120 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 6.76B | 1,732% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.97 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.30 | 9.12 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.12 | 48.80 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.69 | 33.42 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement