Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs LAFSX
FFMMX vs LAFSX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs LAFSX
FFMMX vs LAFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFSX (6.92B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: FFMMX (1.65) vs LAFSX (0.88). FFMMX was incepted earlier than LAFSX: FFMMX (6 years) vs LAFSX (11 years). LAFSX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: LAFSX (0) vs FFMMX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. FFMMX (9.53). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.28 vs. LAFSX (36.91).
| FFMMX | LAFSX | FFMMX / LAFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.69 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.69 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.451 | 13.429 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 6.92B | 1,705% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.88 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 15.38 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | 50.13 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.28 | 36.91 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement