Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs LBSAX
FFMMX vs LBSAX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs LBSAX
FFMMX vs LBSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBSAX (48.6B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: FFMMX (1.65) vs LBSAX (1.26). FFMMX was incepted earlier than LBSAX: FFMMX (6 years) vs LBSAX (24 years). LBSAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). FFMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LBSAX (16.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: FFMMX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). LBSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.79 vs. FFMMX (9.53). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.79 vs. FFMMX (41.28).
| FFMMX | LBSAX | FFMMX / LBSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.90 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.90 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.451 | 11.481 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 48.6B | 243% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.26 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 15.79 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | 40.64 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.28 | 45.79 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement