Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs LBSAX
FFMMX vs LBSAX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs LBSAX
FFMMX vs LBSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. LBSAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and LBSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LBSAX (48.1B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: FFMMX (1.63) vs LBSAX (1.23). FFMMX was incepted earlier than LBSAX: FFMMX (6 years) vs LBSAX (24 years). LBSAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). FFMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LBSAX (19.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: FFMMX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). LBSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.31 vs. FFMMX (5.42). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. FFMMX (39.64).
| FFMMX | LBSAX | FFMMX / LBSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.90 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.90 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.977 | 12.565 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 48.1B | 243% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.23 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 12.31 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 41.39 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | 45.88 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 141.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement