Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs LBSCX
FFMMX vs LBSCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs LBSCX
FFMMX vs LBSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. LBSCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and LBSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LBSCX (48.1B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: FFMMX (1.63) vs LBSCX (0.58). FFMMX was incepted earlier than LBSCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs LBSCX (24 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). FFMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LBSCX (19.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: FFMMX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). LBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. FFMMX (5.42). LBSCX (39.77) and FFMMX (39.64) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFMMX | LBSCX | FFMMX / LBSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.65 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.65 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.977 | 11.978 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 48.1B | 243% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.58 | 280% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 11.32 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 37.68 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | 39.77 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 128.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement