Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs LBSCX
FFMMX vs LBSCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs LBSCX
FFMMX vs LBSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LBSCX (48B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: FFMMX (1.65) vs LBSCX (0.60). FFMMX was incepted earlier than LBSCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs LBSCX (24 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). FFMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LBSCX (16.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: FFMMX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). LBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.25 vs. FFMMX (10.22). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.05 vs. LBSCX (37.77).
| FFMMX | LBSCX | FFMMX / LBSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.65 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.65 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.553 | 9.615 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 48B | 244% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.60 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 13.25 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.20 | 35.28 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.05 | 37.77 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PGLEX | 22.49 | N/A | N/A |
| Putnam Focused International Equity R6 | |||
| LSOFX | 14.54 | N/A | N/A |
| LS Opportunity Fund Institutional Class | |||
| KCGIX | 26.27 | N/A | N/A |
| Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I | |||
| AFEDX | 51.63 | N/A | N/A |
| American Century Large Cap Equity R6 | |||
| TRGOX | 85.85 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Gr Inv | |||